Comparison
Autonomous testing vs findings management
Findings management software organises results that something else produced; Seccuti produces them.
How do they differ in practice?
The differences that change a purchasing decision, side by side.
| Approach | Runs the test | Source of findings | Validation | Retest | What it replaces |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Autonomous testing | Yes | Its own execution | Built into the run | Runs the retest itself | Part of the testing budget |
| Findings management | No | Imported from tools and testers | Whatever the source claimed | Tracks that someone else did it | Part of the reporting budget |
If your problem is that findings arrive in six formats and nobody owns them, a management platform is the right purchase. If your problem is that nothing is testing you between engagements, it will not help.
Try the one you can measure.
Set an envelope and read the output.